20 years later, effects of Exxon Valdez oil spill still being felt in Alaska

Published Monday, March 23, 2009

In this April 1, 1989 photo, a  float plane waits to taxi from an oil-covered beach in Prince William Sound, an inlet off the Gulf of Alaska. The Supreme Court on Wednesday, June 25, 2008, slashed the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster to $500 million. The court ruled that victims of the worst oil spill in U.S. history may collect punitive damages from Exxon Mobil Corp., but not as much as a federal appeals court determined.
In this June 23, 1989 photo, the Exxon Valdez is pictured being towed out of Prince William Sound in Alaska by a tug boat and a U.S. Coast Guard cutter. The Supreme Court on Wednesday, June 25, 2008, slashed the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster to $500 million. The court ruled that victims of the worst oil spill in U.S. history may collect punitive damages from Exxon Mobil Corp., but not as much as a federal appeals court determined.

Related Audio

Capt. Joe Hazelwood reports the Exxon Valdez is hard aground and leaking oil

ANCHORAGE, Alaska - For Steve Smith, the 20-year anniversary of the nation's worst oil spill is like flowers at a loved one's grave, the mourner contemplating a heartbreaking loss alone and without fanfare.

"It's like a death in the family," the 70-year-old fisherman said of the Exxon Valdez disaster. "With time it gets a little better, but the pain never really goes away. Until this generation passes on, I don't think it will ever really be over."

Smith is among the scores of residents of Cordova and other communities whose lives were forever changed on March 24, 1989. That's when the tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground at Alaska's Bligh Reef, spewing 11 million gallons of crude into the rich fishing waters of Prince William Sound. The legal and environmental repercussions are still felt today.

Cordova itself, 45 miles to the southeast, was not directly touched by the slick that soiled 1,200 miles of shoreline. But Smith and other residents say the spill was a staggering blow for a town so reliant on commercial fishing, particularly for herring, whose numbers plummeted several years after the spill and have yet to return.

"It was a tragic accident and one of the lowest points in our history," Exxon Mobil Corp. spokesman Alan Jeffers said Monday of the disaster.

An Anchorage jury awarded victims $5 billion in punitive damages in 1994, but that amount was cut in half by other courts on appeals by Exxon. Smith was planning his retirement with the $2.5 billion in punitive damages that Exxon was expected to pay the nearly 33,000 plaintiffs.

Then last June, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to cut the punitive damages to $507.5 million. That translates to an average of $15,000 per victim. Scores of plaintiffs are still waiting to be paid their share and still unresolved is whether Exxon Mobil should have to pay interest, which would add an estimated $488 million if calculated since 1994.

It's not surprising then, that many Cordova fishermen won't be among those attending a host of events and presentations in Alaska and outside the state commemorating the spill 20 years later. No events are planned by the Cordova District Fishermen United, which represents the commercial fishing fleet in the town of 2,200.

"It's hard to keep dwelling on this thing that has caused so much pain in this community," said executive director Rochelle van den Broek. "The term 'anniversary' kind of offends a lot of fishermen. The term implies celebration and there's nothing to celebrate."

The spill killed hundreds of thousands of birds and other marine animals, inflicting environmental injuries that have not fully recovered, according to numerous scientific studies.

Exxon Mobil countered that many studies found the area healthy and thriving. The Irving, Texas-based company had said punitive damages would be excessive punishment on top of the $3.4 billion in cleanup costs, compensatory payments and fines it already has paid.

Exxon maintained it should not be liable for the actions of the supertanker's skipper, Joseph Hazelwood, when the nearly 1,000-foot vessel ran aground with 53 millions gallons of oil in its hold.

According to prosecutors, Hazelwood was drunk, but he denied it and was acquitted of the charge in criminal court. Plaintiffs say Exxon knew Hazelwood had begun drinking again after seeking treatment, but the company still put him at the helm.

Hazelwood apologized to Alaskans in the recently released book, "The Spill, Personal Stories from the Exxon Valdez Disaster," by Sharon Bushell and Stan Jones.

"Occasionally people have called me a scapegoat, but I've never felt comfortable with that term when applied to me in regard to the oil spill," he says. "I was captain of a ship that ran aground and caused a horrendous amount of damage. I've got to be responsible for that. There's no way around it."

Outwardly, the sound's stunning beauty has been restored, its network of islands, fjords and glaciers offering breathtaking views. But residents in Cordova and other communities say the area is still far from recovered. It took years for salmon numbers to rebound, and sea otters and Harlequin ducks are still below pre-spill numbers there.

An estimated 21,000 gallons of crude linger, researchers say. Jars of oil-stained sand and rocks still being dug up in the spill area can be examined at the Prince William Sound Science Center in Cordova.

"Scientists tell me the remaining oil will take decades and possibly centuries to disappear," said Nancy Bird, president of the science center.

Jeffers, the Exxon spokesman, said the spill led to significant reforms, including improved technologies and a new management system. For example it has instituted drug and alcohol testing for safety sensitive positions, jobs that cannot be held by those with substance abuse histories.

"We learned from this tragedy and went about developing a system to prevent this from ever happening again," Jeffers said.

Sen. Johnny Ellis, the only sitting legislator who was in office in 1989, said the Exxon Valdez disaster spelled the loss of Alaska's innocence.

"That's when Alaskans realized that all the folks they thought were looking out for them were asleep at the wheel," the Anchorage Democrat said.

Still, the state remains bullish on oil and gas development, which is key to its economic viability.

Alaska's politicians continue to push for new development, whether it's oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, offshore oil and gas production or the construction of a $30 billion natural gas pipeline from the North Slope to markets in the midwest

Ellis said complacency has always posed the greatest danger.

The Exxon Valdez spill ripped a hole in that complacency 20 years ago. More recently, Ellis said, it was a corruption scandal that netted prison terms for legislators who were too cozy with an oil services company that was pushing more favorable tax terms for the industry.

"Yes we are doing better," Ellis said. "We learned a lot of things. We improved our systems, but we're not there yet to do the best job we can for the public."

Community Discussion

Newsminer.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full user's agreement.

  1. oklahomatodd
    3/23/2009, 9:50 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    I've been to the area before and years after the the
    oil spill took place and it is a beautiful as ever.
    I've never seen anything on the land or islands that
    even resembles an oil spill.
    Exxon owes all of those who lost their way of life about
    100 times more than 15,000. That is a slap in the face.

  2. Yukonjohn
    3/23/2009, 10:22 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    I agree Todd

    Also, who remembers the bumper sticker: Vote Joe Hazelwood for Governor, employment made possible!

  3. Jason Lamoreaux
    3/23/2009, 10:50 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    oklahomatodd - True it is still beautiful out there, but if you even look a little closely in the areas that were hit with oil during the spill, you will easily see the marks of the spill. Dig down a few inches on the beach, you'll find oil. Look at the rock walls at low tide, there's usually a nice visible line.

    It was interesting to note that my parents came across some guys out "checking for long term impacts" of the spill a couple years ago while out in the sound. They (the inspectors) were happy they were not finding anything. Further conversation showed that these people were employed by Exxon to do the study. When it was pointed out to them that the oil never did get to the area they were looking at in the first place, they said that they were told to take the samples there. Just goes to show you have to be careful who you get your information from.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Also inside
Today's news / Photos / Local / Alaska / Sports / Opinion
Features
Sundays / Health / Food / Outdoors / Latitude 65 / Youth / Business
newsminer.com
Archives / About / Feedback / Privacy Policy / User Agreement / Jobs / Contact / Feeds / Twitter / YouTube / Bookstore
Submit
Letters to the Editor / Applause / Events / Obituaries