Blog: Rod Boyce: The editor's desk

Fun (?) with hyphens

Published Sunday, September 14, 2008

I need vice presidential help.

Or do I need vice-presidential help?

Sarah Palin’s ascension to the national limelight by being named to the No. 2 spot on the Republican ticket has, as I said in my previous post, caused us no end of serious discussion here in the News-Miner’s newsroom.

But it is a nagging question of vice presidential (or is it “vice-presidential”?) hyphenation that has been, well, nagging at me since Sen. John McCain made The Announcement last month. If only he had told us that day “And I stand for ample use of the hyphen.”

But Sen. McCain didn’t say that.

So here I am, arguing for no hyphen but feeling I may be on the wrong end of the debate with the News-Miner’s chief copy editor, who argues that the hyphen in “vice-presidential debate” is needed because the first two words constitute a compound modifier.

Yes, I understand the bit about compound modifiers, but it just seems odd that the hyphen is needed when the two words, except for the “-ial” being added, have a regular meaning unto themselves. They aren’t cobbled together for this one purpose regarding the upcoming debate between two candidates for high office; they hang around together all the time to mean the person who is second in command in the United States of America.

And a hyphen comes with the general concept that it isn’t necessary if its exclusion doesn’t cause ambiguity. And what can be ambiguous about “vice presidential debate”? Nothing, I say.

I can’t find the answer in my grammar/language books. (If you’re interested, by the way, some of my books are “The Deluxe Transitive Vampire,” by Karen Elizabeth Gordon; “Woe is I,” by Patricia T. O'Connor; Webster’s “Standard American Style Manual,” and, of course, Strunk and White’s “The Elements of Style.”

What I need from out there in grammar/punctuation land is a good example of a two-word noun that can be converted to an adjective without the hyphen.

So which is it: hyphen or no? If you’re on my side, let me know where you found the rule. If I’m wrong, well, poke me with a sharpened hyphen, but also tell me where to find that elusive rule.

  1. Rhonda Konicki
    9/26/2008, 7:45 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    No hyphen this time.

    Cute blog!

    Well, I don't have the grammar rules handy at the moment, but as I recall, the basic rule would be to use a hyphen if there's obvious ambiguity. In this case, the title of Vice President has been around for over 200 years in its accepted form.

    Our current culture is happy to use hyphens to the extreme. One of my primary functions at my work place is minute mistress. So an example that comes to mind of when to use or not to use the hyphen would be when the Board is discussing the pay-formula as a document or the act of creating a pay formula for reimbursing physicians.

    Hope that helps,
    -RK

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Also inside
Today's news / Photos / Local / Alaska / Sports / Opinion
Features
Sundays / Health / Food / Outdoors / Latitude 65 / Youth / Business
newsminer.com
Archives / About / Feedback / Privacy Policy / User Agreement / Jobs / Contact / Feeds / Twitter / YouTube / Bookstore
Submit
Letters to the Editor / Applause / Events / Obituaries